NILACHARAL.COM
 
 
  Home  
  Ulagam  
    ? Rajan Darbar
    ? Religion
  Kondattam  
  Arangam  
  Nandhavanam        
  Vanavil  
  Anjaraipetti  
 

Pre-Implantational Genetic Diagnosis - A Controversial Pre-Conception Sex-Selection Procedure

page 1 2 3



 

Avoid the Temptation for Blanket Ban

However, there is no doubt that the iron hands of law should come down heavily on those who perpetuate this crime in order to arrest the damage. But the law has to be sensible enough to accommodate the sentiments of people who long for a baby boy and the social constraints that these people face. If the law is not sensible, it would also face the same fate as PNDT Act which is being religiously violated both by the couples who want baby boys and also by the criminals under the guise of medical doctors. Hence, it is suggested that the new Act should prohibit the pre-conception sex-selection procedure for the first baby and also for any further babies if the earlier babies are boys. There should be provisions in the Act for severe punishments to the parents who opt for this technology to completely avoid a baby girl in the family. The punishments could be long imprisonment or summary dismissal of the couple from their employment. In the case of law against polygamy, the punishment with respect to dismissal from a job is applicable only to the government servants. But in the proposed Act to curb Pre-conception and Pre-natal elimination of baby girls, even the Private sector should be bound by the Act to dismiss a couple from their jobs for indulging in skewing the sex ratio of the nation. The Act must clearly mention that punishments can be awarded even after many years after the crime is committed.

If the law allows this procedure for a couple who already have a baby girl, by opting for such a technology that particular couple would not skew the sex ratio in the country (here the assumption is that two children norm would be followed by all couples). Rather it would avoid many abortions and there by women in this country would become healthier than what they are today. Repeated abortions lead to fits of unconsciousness and severe anxiety. Also, there must be a room in the new Act, which should allow this technology to be resorted to for avoiding genetic disorders in the progeny. The intention behind this appeal is that the Act should not put a blanket ban on the use of the technology instead the Act must also encourage the good use of the technology. Unfortunately, when the media rightly brings out the bad consequences of this technology, hardly any one argues for the good use of this technology. Remember even the ultrasound scan technology is used predominantly for checking any anomaly in the growth of the foetus during pregnancy and to avoid the baby if it is afflicted with any genetically inherited disastrous diseases from the parents. It is unfortunate that this scan technology is widely misused.

In stead of completely banning the technology, let us find a way out to make the best use of it while prohibiting the misuse of the technology. No doubt, constant watch of a regulatory authority is needed to make the best sue of this technology. The government should act fast and should not allow procedural delays to come in the way. The readers may send in their views and suggestions to the Joint Secretary (Policy) Department of Family Welfare, Union Health Ministry, Government of India, New Delhi.

Naangal vimarsanam   © 2001 www.nilacharal.com. All rights reserved.