In the aftermath of Babri demolition there was
a new realization in the country as a whole that RSS, whose
volunteers are generally working in the quiet fashion in the area
of culture, are not so innocuous as it seemed. The Khaki clad,
male who worships his motherland daily morning is a part of the
organization, which in times to come wants to dictate the politics
of the country, started becoming apparent. The reason for this
is not too far to seek. This 'quiet' work on one level acts as
the patron for the politics, which has shaken the democratic roots
of the society. And it is also the one, which provides volunteers
to the children organizations for strengthening the saffron politics,
it is also the one which is the major force which is saffronising
the society in a subtle manner. Though BJP, VHP etc. have hogged
the limelight for times, their subservient loyalty and devotion
to the agenda of RSS started becoming apparent to all and sundry.
It is to unravel this deeper organic connection and the hidden
bridge and the concealed link that A. G. Noorani has put
forward his case in a manner, which not only is rigorous but also
is flawless.
The strongest point of the book is of course the thorough
research, which has gone in to the writing of the book, which has
very impressive list of resources and rare references. Noorani has
done a yeoman service in marshalling the facts in this book, in
turn making it a crucial source book for all those who wish to
understand this organization and its wily methods of operation.
Though in popular eyes it is the BJP which is the vehicle of the
politics of Hindu Right, Noorani shows the controlling role
of RSS right from the beginning of the formation of the Bharatiya
Jana Sangh, the less known predecessor of today's BJP. The agenda
of RSS is Hindu Rashtra based on Hindutva and it adopts
the definition of Hindutva as propounded by Savarkar, Apart from
religious aspect involved in the conception of the words Hindu
and Hinduism, Savarkar had to coin some new words such as Hindutva,
Hinduness, Hindudom in order to express totality of cultural,
historical and above all the national aspects along with the religious
one, which mark out the Hindu people as a whole. The definition
is not consequently meant to be definition of Hindu Dharma,
or Hindu religion. It is the definition of Hindutva, Hinduness.(Savarkar,
1942)
Noorani points out, based on the quotes from Golwalkar, that RSS
regards the non-Hindus as mere guests and not the sons of the
soil. Also of these non-Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Communists
are regarded as internal threats to the Hindu Nation. Noorani
gives the correct analogy of RSS methods in politics by pointing
out that RSS wants to hold the empire without becoming the
emperor. This method of holding an empire has its advantages as
the negative impact of the day-to-day politicking and corrupt
practices of the progenies does not have direct adverse impact on
it and it can keep up its pure image.
Starting from this concept, RSS went on to train the young boys,
well indoctrinated in the ideology of Hindutva, as volunteers
for its activities. In one of the impeccably referenced chapters
(The Sangh Parivar and The British) the author shows the subservient
attitude of Hindutva politicians towards the British Empire, and
Savarkars undertaking to the British govt. to seek his release
from Andamans. He also shows how two outfits of Hindutva politics
(Hindu Maha Sabha and RSS) merged together in the form of Nathuram
Godse the killer of Mahatma Gandhi, Father of the Nation.
The need to form a political wing was felt after the post-Gandhi
murder ban on RSS, when its Supremo Golwalkar conceded to the
request of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, an ex-Hindu Maha Sabha leader
to form a new political party for the agenda of Hindu Rashtra.
RSS lent its Swayamsevaks to work for Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the
previous avatar of the current BJP. Two of the most illustrious
Swayamsevaks are currently the major vehicle
of communal politics in India, Mr. Vajpayee and Mr. Advani.
Noorani gives apt quotes from original
sources to prove his point. One of the most poignant references
is from Justice P. Venugopal commission of inquiry, which investigated
the Kanyakumari riots (March 1982) and from Jitendra Narian Commission
of inquiry (Bhagalpur riots 1979). These quotes shows without
any shadow of doubt the role of RSS in laying the base of communal
violence and the role of its cadres who have infiltrated in
the state machinery in sustaining it. Two features stand out in
all the riots-RSS men deliberately march in procession through
Muslim areas shouting offensive slogans and the slightest response
is seized as pretext to launch preplanned attacks (Noorani, 2000,
40) Noorani reminds us that even Sardar Patel-who would have liked
RSS to join Congress-accused it of spreading communal poison.
In the face of state repression RSS always bent and the its attitude
on its cadres being arrested during emergency, which was opposed
by RSS, is no exception. Its chief started sending the messages
of patch up to Indira Gandhi. In those messages he requested for
RSS cadres being released but never urged upon her to lift the
emergency.
The author meticulously traces the birth of different organizations
from the womb of RSS and the assigned role of these for the politics
of Hindu Rashtra and their role in intensifying and vitiating
the communal scenario. Be it BJP, (political), VHP (quasi religious),
Bajarang Dal (storm troopers) or the innocuous looking Vanavasi
Kalyan Ashram, each of them is controlled from the top by
RSS volunteers. It is their coordinated activity, which resulted
in the demolition of Babri Masjid. The current Anti-Christian
campaign, and other programs of Sangh Parivar are also elaborated
very well.
Undoubtedly the facts, the quotes the events that give an insight
to the politics of RSS are presented extremely well. What is
missing however is the understanding of social base of this
political outfit. Which social sections support it and why? How
are they able to mobilize the other sections in to its agenda? The
analysis of RSS as a political onslaught has not been elaborated.
Why the agenda of RSS started getting more response from the
decade of 80s is not considered at all. The book is weak on these
counts. Despite these omissions one gets a total and credible
picture of the making and functioning of RSS. It is strong on
outlining the relationship between the parent RSS and the children
BJP, VHP etc. It is a good and handy book for the activists for
secular democracy, good source for the meticulous references about
the outpourings of its leaders. All in all it is a book, which
cannot and should not be missed by those striving for preservation
of the gains of our freedom struggle, the values of Liberty,
Equality and
Fraternity.
References:
S.S.Savarkar, Preface to
Hindutva-Who is a Hindu, Nagpur, 1942
A.G.Noorani, The RSS and BJP: A Division of Labor, Leftword, 2000
Delhi
|