The arrest of Shankaracharya Jayendra Sarswati, the
pontiff of Kanchi Kamkoti Peetham as the main accused
in the murder of a Shankar Raman, a manager in the math
(place of the holy seer) (Nov. 12,2004) came as a big
surprise to many. The possibility of political motives
being there is not very strong as he was close to the
AIDMK Government of J. Jayalalitha. Just because DMK
was threatening to launch an agitation may not be a
strong motive for his arrest. In this case already many
an accused have been arrested and interrogated. It is
probably on the basis of this that he has been arrested.
While it remains a mystery as to why he had to be arrested
in Mahboob Nagar near Hyderabad in the middle of the
night on a Diwali day, it seems the police had prima
facie case on hand and that's why they arrested him.
While many observers said that it is a police case and
should be dealt with like that, Vishwa Hindu Parishad
went hammer and tongs against the Government. As per
its major media face, Dr. Praveenbhai Togadia, this
arrest has been made to please the Muslims in pursuance
of the vote bank politics. He went on to state that
there are many a cases against Shahi Imam but he is
not arrested. Also that it is a humiliation to the Hindu
society and in retaliation they will protest and the
ministers will not be blessed in the Hindu temples for
the next day. He also threatened to launch an agitation
against the arrest of Holy seer. While Mr. Modi the
Chief Minister of Gujarat talked to the Prime minister
saying that Government should think of the sentiments
of the people before arresting such holy people.
One is not sure as to how much religious following Shankaracharya
has amongst the Hindus. It seems it is only amongst
a section of Hindu. One also does not know as to which
cases are pending against Shahi Imam of Delhi and as
to why Dr. Togadia did not demand Imam's arrest earlier.
It is noteworthy here that Shahi Imam had issued a statement
before the general elections to vote for BJP. Also that
Jayalalitha is a part of NDA coalition led by BJP. Also,
her pro-Hindutva leanings are no secret for anybody.
One has to basically fall back on the assumption that
there is a case for arrest for Shankaracharya and so
police have arrested him.
Does he represent the Hindus of the country? Surely
this is not an elected post and it is through the inheritance
of the Maths that the likes of him come to occupy these
seats of power and pelf. The views of Shankaracharya
about dalits and women may not be heartening to large
section of India's Hindus. Talking of such maths these
are the places dime a dozen, though Shankaracharya does
have an exalted position amongst those. These maths
have great amount of wealth, which comes through donations
of the people. Since most of the chiefs of these Maths
are bachelors, many a times there is a power struggle
after the demise of the chiefs and in that there are
serious clashes not tantamounting to even the most serious
crimes. This is a whole world by itself full of all
the dimensions of human life, quest for power, jealousy,
money and all that. But of course all this is in the
name of religion.
Can these Holy seers be above the law? Can they be law
unto themselves? One recalls that in pre industrial
Europe Church, clergy was very powerful and was in close
alliance with the power of Kings and landlords. Also
that the other type of religious people are saints,
the one's who generally live in penury, close to the
average people and away from the power centers of society.
The saints used to be persecuted by the clergy for their
articulation of the problems of the downtrodden, for
their association with the poor and deprived.
After secularization, the coming in of modern education
and industry the social equations change. This process
of secularization sees the changed role of religion
in the life of society. Especially the role of clergy
changes and it no more remains a dominant force. In
India unfortunately the process of secularization, the
disjunction between power and clergy has not been complete.
Though this clergy does not enjoy the same pre-eminent
position like the one they enjoyed a century ago, their
power is still palpable and many of them like Shahi
Imam or Shankaracharya come to assume a dominant position
through their ochre robes or beards and sherwin's. Surely
nobody, whatever be one's status in religious hierarchy
can be above law of the land.
Democracy does not recognize the power of the landlord
clergy. Here the basic principle of Liberty Equality
Fraternity prevails and all of us are equal in the eyes
of law. The clergy, whatever its role as the mediator
between man and God, woman does not matter in this scheme
of things as in this value system women have a subordinate
status in the society, does not have a special legal
position in democratic set up. Of course one has to
ensure that neither favour nor discrimination, towards
anybody, is done in the matters of deliverance of justice.
While this Shankaracharya has been prominent due to
his efforts to 'solve' Babri issue, his values and worldview
do not go along with the values of Indian constitution.
One can understand as to why VHP, BJP is up to attribute
motives to this arrest and to project this as an insult
to Hindu community. It is such type of issues in which
these organizations thrive, emotive and generally not
concerned with the problems of the people. They are
on the look out for such issues and starting from Ram
temple issue to Baba Budan Giri, Bhojshala down to Afzal
Khan's tomb one can see a clear pattern in their approach
to politics.
The only drawback in this arrest seems to be that the
RSS progeny, will get one more issue to whip up hysteria.
It has been looking for more emotive issues after Ram
temple has stopped to being electoral productive. But
surely people have seen too much of it over a period
of last decade. It is not take off as an issue is written
on the wall.
|